Roof deficiencies a concern at Bracebridge's new $75M Muskoka Lumber Community Centre

The town says construction deficiencies and snow load damage are cause for concern

Roof deficiencies were addressed as a concern at Bracebridge's new $75M Muskoka Lumber Community Centre (MLCC), in the September 1, 2026, General Committee meeting.

Councillor, Debbie Vernon, inquired about the status of roof repairs at the facility, prompting staff to explain that the Town is dealing with both damage associated with last winter's exceptional snow loads and construction deficiencies.

Staff indicated an insurance claim related to snow damage “from exceptional snow loads from 2025” have been approved and the Town is currently working through the process.

The Town is also looking at enhancements to improve the roof's resiliency, including the addition of snow breaks, which staff said will be necessary for future insurance coverage.

However, Director of Recreation, Rick Cox, explained that some of the roof problems are related to construction deficiencies rather than snow damage.

Cox said the Town is using an engineer and legal to address the deficiencies, while in discussions with the contractor to have the issues addressed.

He continued that although a warranty was provided “it will not be given yet because the deficiencies are not yet rectified.” Therefore, they are “fighting with the contractor to achieve a roof properly built first.”

As a result, more funds will be needed to cover the legal and engineering consultations.

Cox added that the Town will also be responsible for costs of current roof issues. He said, “Costs we’re dealing with now won’t be recovered,” as the warranty takes effect once the roof is properly done.

The cost of addressing the roof issues, along with legal and engineering consultations hasn’t yet been indicated.

According to staff, there is agreement that deficiencies exist, but discussions are continuing over why they occurred and who is responsible for correcting them.

Cox explained, “Moving and shifting in the roof structure caused some leaks and caused damage to places and sections not attached properly.”

He added that discussions are in place about who’s responsible for fixing it, with contractors indicating the issues are a result of “building movement” and engineers saying “that’s not the case.”

He said, “We don’t care why, we want the roof fixed.”

“I won’t say that I’m happy with the situation. I’m frustrated with the finger pointing that’s going on and the time that it’s taken. We’re exercising our legal opportunities to make that point,” said Cox.

Councillor, Barry Hammond, asked, “Are we still exposed,” because of still having problems with the roof issues?

Cox replied, “Yes. We are still exposed.”